Get a DemoTELEPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IDENTITY PLATFORM
Teleport vs. CyberArk: Modern PAM Comparison
Teleport redefines Privileged Access Management (PAM) to simplify and secure modern engineering with one identity model, one control plane, and zero credentials or vaults. CyberArk’s complex legacy PAM architecture silos identities and relies on credential vault and rotation workflows.
Trusted by Market Leaders
Teleport Simplifies PAM for
Modern Engineering Infrastructure
Teleport outperforms CyberArk and legacy PAM software by authenticating with real identity, not credentials. While CyberArk’s complexity makes scalability an uphill battle, Teleport is purpose-built to make scaling alongside new tech effortless — across cloud-native and legacy infrastructure alike.
Unify governance for human and non-human identities across Linux, Kubernetes, Windows, database, cloud, and on-premises infrastructure with no add-ons or silos. Enforce least privileged access at 100% to become immune to entire attack patterns with minimal configuration. All while accelerating engineering velocity.
Real Teleport Outcomes:
98% faster investigations
Reduce time spent correlating audit logs by 98% from hours to minutes
10x faster access
Automate provisioning and approvals to give engineers access in seconds
Same-day audit readiness
Make audits turnkey with deep audit trails across identities and zero credentials to account for
The intricacies of modern infrastructure demand more robust security solutions. Infrastructure Identity is a compelling approach to this challenge.
Stephanie Walter, Analyst-in-Residence, HyperFRAME Research
Why Enterprises Choose Teleport Over CyberArk
✔ Core PAM features without legacy baggage
Teleport deploys as a single binary and scales cleanly across all infrastructure,
supporting cloud-native backends like Athena, RDS Postgres, Dynamo, S3, and KMS, among others.
CyberArk is infamously challenging to deploy in cloud and self-hosted environments, requiring a
sprawling stack of separately managed modules, control planes, and too many acronyms to list.
✔ Zero credentials to vault, rotate, or leak
Teleport eliminates static credentials entirely by issuing short-lived X.509 certificates for every connection.
CyberArk depends on vaults, password checkouts, and rotation schedules — complex workflows that create operational drag and a constant risk surface.
✔ Just-in-time by default
Teleport issues just-in-time (JIT) access automatically with auto-expiry and policy-as-code workflows, making Zero Standing Privileges (ZSP) the default everywhere.
CyberArk promises JIT by using separately managed and licensed tools tied to vaulted credentials, while leaving critical resources like Kubernetes unsupported by Zero Standing Privileges.
✔ Unified human & machine identity
Teleport governs humans, machines, workloads, devices, bots, and AI agents from a single platform.
CyberArk still treats workforce and privileged users separately, leaving non-human identities to be managed in different consoles and policy silos. Teleport consolidates everything into one identity model, one policy engine, and one audit trail.
✔ Centralized control without silos
Teleport replaces fragmentation with a single control plane, unifying SSH, Windows, Kubernetes, databases, internal web apps, and more under one dashboard beloved by developers and security teams alike.
CyberArk spreads control across multiple consoles, products, and policy layers, making administration slow and siloed.
✔ Actionable session telemetry, not just videos
Teleport records at the kernel level (via eBPF), generating real-time, searchable logs enriched with per-command events — turning session monitoring into actionable security signals.
CyberArk captures video or keystrokes at the protocol layer, difficult to search and even harder to automate.
✔ Open source transparency & verifiable security
Teleport’s open source foundation means security can be inspected, validated, and trusted by the community.
CyberArk depends on their proprietary claims and brand image to build credibility, not transparency or validation.
Teleport vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
Teleport vs. CyberArk: Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Feature | Teleport | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
Access Architecture | Zero trust access at every connection with identity verification. Acts as a unified gateway/proxy with built-in Certificate Authority, requiring no VPN or direct network trust | Dependent on network connectivity to vaults and jump servers. Large environments may require dozens or hundreds of jump servers. |
Device Trust | First-class Device Trust at the infrastructure access layer. Can require verified, enrolled devices (per role or cluster-wide) before access. Device identity recorded in audit. | Does not enforce device attestation at the PAM/SIA session layer, leaving a gap where unmanaged or non-compliant endpoints can initiate privileged access. Offers “Device Trust” only via CyberArk’s SSO and third-party MDM/UEM integrations, and only for application access and portal logins. |
Deployment Support | Single cloud-native platform for everything: cloud, hybrid, on-prem, or air-gapped. Agentless enrollment is supported. Ships ready to scale to hundreds of thousands of resources with resource auto-discovery capabilities, including: | Separate SaaS and on-prem products can complicate scalability. Enterprise deployments are typically complex and require managing multiple distinct components (i.e., vault servers, jump servers, credential brokers). |
Identity Governance | Automates governance with Access Lists (recertification cadence, owners, audit). Integrates with SCIM to sync group memberships to access lists. End-to-end Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) deployment and management. | Has no unified identity governance capabilities. Extends governance to privileged accounts via certifications of vault accounts. IGA via add-on is managed separately which can increase complexity. |
Just-in-Time Access & Zero Standing Privileges | Built-in just-in-time (JIT) access with automated, short-lived privilege grants. Enables Zero Standing Privileges, ensuring access is temporary, identity-based, and automatically expires. Approvals map to roles and result in auto-expiring certs/permissions. | Ticket-based or manual privilege elevation. Just-in-time is managed separately and limited for certain use cases. Does not support JIT or ZSP for Kubernetes; access is restricted to vaulted-credentials only. |
Non-Human Identity (Workloads, CI/CD, AI Agents) | Native support for non-human identities. Issues short-lived certificates to bots under the same policy engine as human users. No credentials or secrets. | Fragmented support for non-human identities. Machine and workload identities are handled via separate credential management components. Uses secret retrieval and rotation workflows. |
Passwordless Access | Uses short-lived X.509 cryptographic certificates issued after SSO or WebAuthn passwordless login. No static credentials or vaulted credentials for resource access. | Default model is vaulted credentials with check-in/out and rotation. |
Per-Session MFA | Per-session MFA can be enforced to require users to perform MFA at connection time (e.g., SSH/Kubernetes). | MFA is enforced at sign-on only. MFA caching allows multiple target connections within a window without re-prompting, unless additional controls are configured. |
Resource Discovery | Auto-discovers and enrolls servers, databases, and Kubernetes by default. | Resource auto-discovery is limited, focused primarily on privileged accounts via scanners/agents. Kubernetes targets require additional platform imports and account setup. |
Session Recording | Structured kernel-level activity detail (eBPF) capturing obfuscation, shell script execution, and terminal controls for deep visibility. Produces low-latency, text-based audit logs with copy/paste supported. | No kernel-level telemetry. Video or keystroke replay only. |
Threat Detection & Response | Complete identity event correlation across systems (e.g., Okta, AWS, GitHub). Can lock users/agents/sessions in real time to terminate active connections or block new ones. | No cross-system identity correlation. Automated credential remediations can be configured in response to events. |
Updates & Downtime | High availability architecture with rolling/scheduled updates across all environments, including self-hosted. Cloud SLA 99.9% (or 99.99% with multi-region HA). | Major upgrades typically require professional services for certifications and require 10-15 min downtimes. Self-hosted upgrades require component sequencing. Vault HA required SCSI-3 PR-capable shared storage. |
How Teleport Works: Common Questions Answered
Here’s a breakdown to clarify common questions about Teleport’s Infrastructure Identity Platform and how it actually works.
Is Teleport an IdP?
No, Teleport is not an IdP. Instead, Teleport integrates with your existing IdP or SSO for authentication and acts as the access plane, issuing ephemeral certificates and enforcing authorization policies.
Does Teleport deliver Zero Standing Privileges (ZSP)?
Yes. Teleport issues short-lived certificates automatically for every connection, making just-in-time and Zero Standing Privileges the default posture across your infrastructure.
Does Teleport support non-human identities (workloads, CI/CD, AI agents)?
Yes. Teleport issues short-lived certificates to machines and workloads under the same policy engine as human users, rather than separating them into different systems.
How does Teleport support compliance and audits?
Teleport enforces compliance requirements proactively and automatically through ephemeral certificates, biometric authentication, RBAC, and kernel-level session logs so all requests are authenticated, authorized, and recorded. Machine-readable logs can be streamed to SIEM/SOAR for real-time compliance automation.
Does Teleport provide session recordings and reviews?
Yes, Teleport records SSH, Kubernetes, desktop, and database sessions with structured, machine-readable logs and replay capabilities. All session events and commands are captured as structured JSON for compliance and seamless SIEM/SOAR integration.
Does Teleport replace password vaults?
Yes, Teleport replaces the need for password vaults by eliminating static credentials from the access chain. However, Teleport can integrate with secret vaults to guard access and enforce strong, auditable controls in environments where vaults remain in use.
Does Teleport require a jump server?
No, Teleport does not use jump servers. Every connection is authenticated and encrypted end-to-end using certificates, eliminating the need for VPNs, bastions, proxies, or jump hosts.
Does Teleport provide endpoint privilege management (EPM)?
Teleport reduces the need for many EPM controls by centralizing identity, eliminating static credentials, and enforcing least privilege by default.
Does Teleport support on-prem and air-gapped systems?
Teleport supports all public and private clouds as well as on-prem infrastructure, including air-gapped or isolated networks. CyberArk claims to offer hybrid coverage, but only through the use of multiple modules.
Does Teleport help control costs compared to CyberArk?
Yes. Teleport eliminates the need for multiple products, vault servers, and professional services. Everything operates under one control plane, with transparent licensing based on resources rather than bolt-on services.
Is Teleport easier to use than CyberArk?
Yes. Engineers connect with familiar tools like SSH, kubectl, and psql, with ephemeral certificates issued automatically in the background, avoiding portal-based workflows that add friction.
Avoid Legacy Complexity. Accelerate Engineering Velocity Instead.
Enforce least privilege everywhere and keep engineers in their flow-state with a single, modern platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CyberArk complex?
Users report that CyberArk deployments often comprise multiple components like vaults, brokers, session managers, and jump servers, each requiring separate configuration and upkeep. This layered architecture can create operational complexity and maintenance overhead.
Is CyberArk difficult to maintain?
CyberArk requires managing deployments across multiple modules and ensuring they remain interoperable, which can strain administrative resources. Customers frequently rely on third-party consultants to streamline maintenance.
Does CyberArk support cloud-native and multi-cloud?
CyberArk supports hybrid and cloud environments, but these deployments typically require specific modules or separate integrations, which can add to complexity.
How long does it take to deploy CyberArk?
CyberArk deployments may take several months or more due to the number of components involved (e.g., vaults, brokers, or connectors). Rollouts may require dedicated professional services and consulting engagements.
Does CyberArk enable Zero Standing Privileges (ZSP)?
CyberArk offers some ZSP-like functionality, but users report this requires additional modules and workflow configurations. Overall, ZSP implementation is viewed as more complex compared to identity-native solutions like Teleport.
Is CyberArk expensive?
CyberArk’s base pricing can be overshadowed by hidden costs like implementation services, integration fees, training, and ongoing support, making overall deployment more expensive than it appears at first glance.
Is CyberArk easy for engineers to use?
Engineers report that accessing systems via CyberArk requires using portals or jump servers, which can interrupt development workflows.
Does CyberArk support non-human identities (workloads, CI/CD, AI agents)?
Yes, CyberArk can support machine and non-human identities but requires them to be managed in separate consoles and workflows. This fragmentation can introduce operational inefficiencies and expose risk.